[Deptheads] Child Care at the Convention

Norman Carlson carlsonnorm at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 11 11:42:32 PST 2008


I can check with the hotels around Disneyland again, sense i work at the convention center it will be easy for me.

Norm

----- Original Message ----
From: Eric M. Aldrich I <ealdrich at penguinlust.org>
To: deptheads at strategicon.net
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:45:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Deptheads] Child Care at the Convention


The 
cons 
actually 
all 
started 
in 
Orange 
County 
-- 
Orccon 
was 
first 
held 
at 
CSU 
Fullerton 
(I 
think, 
I 
wasn't 
there 
for 
this 
one), 
Gateway 
at 
the 
Sheraton 
Anaheim 
(next 
to 
Disneyland) 
and 
Gamex 
at 
Chapman 
College.

For 
the 
sake 
of 
those 
that 
travel, 
we'd 
have 
to 
be 
near 
John 
Wayne 
airport. 
The 
earliest 
moving 
is 
realistic 
is 
2010.

I'm 
not 
opposed 
to 
this, 
but 
we'd 
have 
to 
plan 
this 
out 
thoroughly.

Eric

On 
Mon, 
Feb 
11, 
2008 
at 
10:33:38AM 
-0800, 
DB 
wrote:
> 
If 
we?re 
truly 
serious 
about 
aiming 
for 
families, 
long 
term 
plans 
might 
be
> 
to 
move 
the 
con 
to 
family-friendly 
Orange 
County.  
 
I?m 
just 
saying 
that
> 
having 
the 
con 
at 
a 
hotel 
near 
crummy-neighborhood 
LAX 
on 
a 
street 
full 
of
> 
strip 
clubs 
isn?t 
exactly 
a 
family 
environment.  
Plus, 
since 
real 
estate 
in
> 
Los 
Angeles 
urban 
area 
is 
so 
high, 
the 
middle-class 
family 
audience 
that
> 
would 
show 
up 
at 
the 
con 
doesn?t 
live 
anywhere 
close.  
Plus, 
if 
we 
were 
in
> 
Orange 
County, 
we?d 
be 
that 
much 
more 
accessible 
to 
bedroom 
communities 
in
> 
san 
diego, 
riverside 
and 
san 
bernardino 
counties.  
When 
the 
con 
started 
in
> 
the 
L.A. 
Area 
all 
those 
years 
ago, 
it 
was 
a 
very 
different 
demographic 
that
> 
lived 
in 
the 
city.  
We 
might 
need 
to 
reconsider 
our 
location 
in 
the 
coming
> 
years 
and 
make 
the 
jump 
to 
where 
our 
intended 
attendees 
actually 
live.
> 
>  
- 
Denys
> 
> 
> 
> 
On 
2/11/08 
8:24 
AM, 
"Heather 
Hughes" 
<heather at gibsongirl.net> 
wrote:
> 
> 
> 
I 
have 
all 
the 
information 
she 
(Lisa) 
aquired 
on 
that 
.  
I 
still 
have 
the
> 
> 
company 
info.  
In 
2007 
it 
was 
too 
much 
of 
a 
cost 
with 
a 
new 
convention
> 
> 
management 
for 
us 
to 
afford, 
so 
we 
put 
it 
on 
the 
back 
burner.  
We 
can 
revisit
> 
> 
it 
again 
at 
the 
next 
meeting 
if 
you 
like.  
I 
will 
call 
the 
service 
again 
in
> 
> 
anticpation 
of 
a 
more 
detailed 
discussion 
on 
their 
services 
and 
cost 
for 
May.
> 
>  
> 
> 
Heather
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
On 
2/8/08, 
Norman 
Carlson 
<carlsonnorm at yahoo.com> 
wrote:
> 
>> 
We 
need 
to 
attract 
the 
family 
to 
the 
con, 
as 
Patrick 
stated 
"The 
con 
is
> 
>> 
getting 
older, 
and 
we 
need 
it 
to 
get 
younger 
or 
our 
con 
is 
dying 
a 
slow
> 
>> 
death", 
we 
started 
working 
on 
this 
in 
2005, 
by 
acquiring 
a 
licensed 
bonded
> 
>> 
company 
to 
run 
a 
kids 
room. 
Lisa 
was 
handling 
this 
for 
us 
and  
has 
a 
lot 
of
> 
>> 
information 
that 
we 
could 
probably 
get 
from 
her. 
If 
i 
remember 
correctly 
she
> 
>> 
had 
a 
company 
that 
we 
where 
considering 
in 
right 
before 
the 
con 
was 
sold.
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
Norm
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
----- 
Original 
Message 
----
> 
>> 
From: 
DB 
<noldor at gmail.com>
> 
>> 
To: 
deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
>> 
Sent: 
Friday, 
February 
8, 
2008 
7:54:57 
AM
> 
>> 
Subject: 
Re: 
[Deptheads] 
Re: 
Computer 
Room 
Tourneys
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
I 
think 
we 
should 
put 
Rob 
in 
charge 
of 
day 
care. 
I 
imagine 
pursuits
> 
>> 
throughout 
the 
con 
like 
something 
out 
of 
Logan's 
Run. 
Carousel! 
Carousel!
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
- 
Den
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
-----Original 
Message-----
> 
>> 
From: 
"Karl 
Kreder" 
<zeotter at gmail.com>
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
Date: 
Fri, 
8 
Feb 
2008 
07:51:32
> 
>> 
To:deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
>> 
Subject: 
Re: 
[Deptheads] 
Re: 
Computer 
Room 
Tourneys
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
We 
have 
a 
large 
family 
group 
of 
3 
families 
worth 
of 
kids 
(about 
8-10 
of 
them,
> 
>> 
ages 
from 
around 
6 
to 
13) 
and 
4 
adults.  
They 
have 
come 
to 
the 
last 
3 
cons
> 
>> 
and 
say 
that 
they 
bring 
the 
kids 
to 
get 
them 
off 
the 
video 
games 
for 
a
> 
>> 
weekend. 
Just 
an 
FYI
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
On 
Feb 
7, 
2008 
10:30 
PM, 
Robert 
Lionheart 
<spinachcat at yahoo.com
> 
>> 
<mailto:spinachcat at yahoo.com> 
> 
wrote: 
If 
you 
truly 
want 
to 
tap 
the 
family
> 
>> 
market, 
you 
need 
a 
fully 
funded 
kids 
room 
with 
babysitting 
/ 
kids 
play
> 
>> 
volunteers.  
 
Kubla 
has 
this 
and 
its 
a 
huge 
resource 
drain, 
but 
they 
are
> 
>> 
betting 
on 
the 
long 
term 
idea 
of 
a 
family 
oriented 
convention.  
  
An 
enhanced
> 
>> 
video 
game 
room 
is 
a 
double-edged 
situation.  
 
While 
should 
bring 
the
> 
>> 
attention 
of 
the 
younger 
audience, 
you 
run 
the 
distinct 
risk 
of 
such 
an 
area
> 
>> 
becoming 
a 
"kids' 
area" 
when 
the 
convention 
is 
not 
set 
up 
with 
personnel 
to
> 
>> 
deal 
with 
such 
an 
area.  
  
 
The 
security 
issues 
alone 
are 
quite 
daunting 
as
> 
>> 
are 
equipment 
liabilities.  
 
One 
time 
a 
kid 
goes 
missing 
due 
to 
completely
> 
>> 
innocent 
wandering 
and 
you 
can 
bet 
the 
crap 
will 
hit 
the 
fan 
at 
high 
speed.
> 
>> 
While 
this 
may 
not 
have 
been 
an 
issue 
when 
only 
a 
handful 
of 
kids 
are
> 
>> 
present, 
try 
to 
juggle 
this 
problem 
with 
five 
times 
the 
number 
of 
young
> 
>> 
children.  
Also, 
is 
ANYONE 
on 
our 
!
> 
>> 
staff 
trained 
and 
licensed 
to 
monitor 
children 
in 
a 
commercial 
space?
> 
>> 
Also, 
I 
do 
not 
believe 
we 
have 
to 
aim 
that 
young 
at 
all.  
The 
high 
school 
/
> 
>> 
college 
crowd 
/ 
young 
adult 
market 
is 
very 
good 
and 
the 
older 
/ 
returning
> 
>> 
gamer 
is 
another 
choice 
target.  
 
If 
the 
convention 
wants 
to 
focus 
on 
family
> 
>> 
entertainment 
that 
is 
quite 
possible  
BUT 
there 
would 
need 
to 
be 
significant
> 
>> 
changes 
to 
make 
that 
happen.  
 
To 
make 
that 
happen, 
the 
convention 
would 
need
> 
>> 
a 
much 
more 
mundane 
family 
game 
track.  
Stuff 
that 
people 
recognize.  
 
I
> 
>> 
don't 
mean 
members 
of 
BBG.  
 
I 
mean 
people 
who 
shop 
at 
ToysRus 
and 
never
> 
>> 
heard 
of 
Catan.  
I 
am 
taking 
Chutes 
& 
Ladders 
and 
games 
where 
families 
can
> 
>> 
play 
as 
a 
whole 
with 
other 
families.  
 
You 
would 
have 
to 
Disneyesque 
things
> 
>> 
to 
a 
great 
degree.  
 
There 
would 
have 
to 
be 
MUCH 
more 
focus 
aimed 
at
> 
>> 
entertaining 
the 
6-10 
year 
old 
and 
their 
parents 
at 
the 
same 
event.  
  
 
If
> 
>> 
you 
look 
at 
family 
marketing, 
you 
will 
see 
that 
the 
family 
focused 
event
> 
>> 
marketing 
has 
a 
maj!
> 
>> 
or 
keystone 
- 
they 
market 
the 
idea 
that 
only 
people 
there 
are 
other 
fa
> 
>> 
milies.  
Families 
view 
this 
as 
an 
important 
factor 
in 
the 
assumption 
of 
fun
> 
>> 
and 
safety.  
 
Go 
view 
advertisements 
for 
zoos, 
Legoland, 
Whatever 
on 
Ice 
and
> 
>> 
other 
family 
focused 
events.  
They 
do 
NOT 
include 
single 
males 
in 
their
> 
>> 
marketing.  
 
In 
fact, 
these 
people 
do 
not 
exist 
in 
Family 
Marketing 
World.
> 
>> 
Last 
time 
I 
checked, 
males 
attending 
without 
kids 
is 
our 
main 
demographic.
> 
>> 
Otherwise, 
just 
saying 
"sure, 
bring 
your 
kids" 
is 
not 
enough 
to 
draw 
anyone.
> 
>> 
Currently, 
there 
is 
NO 
reason 
to 
bring 
your 
family 
to 
the 
convention 
if 
you
> 
>> 
have 
6-11 
year 
old 
children.  
 
We 
have 
ZERO 
focus 
on 
their 
needs 
and 
we 
do
> 
>> 
NOT 
have 
a 
child 
secure 
atmosphere.
> 
>> 
> 
>>  
 
- 
Robert  
 
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
Patrick 
Havert 
<patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net
> 
>> 
<mailto:patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net> 
> 
wrote:  
Robert,  
 
As 
head 
of 
marketing
> 
>> 
do 
you 
think 
Teen 
parents 
may 
look 
at 
the 
website?  
Come 
on 
and 
grow 
up,
> 
>> 
unless 
we 
do 
something 
that 
younger 
kids 
can 
attend 
they 
have 
no 
reason 
to 
go
> 
>> 
to 
the 
con 
and 
neither 
do 
their 
families.  
If 
we 
eliminate 
that 
group 
for 
a
> 
>> 
few 
years, 
do 
you 
think 
they'll 
really 
come 
back?  
The 
con 
is 
getting 
older,
> 
>> 
and 
we 
need 
it 
to 
get 
younger 
or 
our 
con 
is 
dying 
a 
slow 
death.  
I 
admit 
that
> 
>> 
teens 
are 
better, 
but 
we 
want 
people 
to 
be 
able 
to 
bring 
their 
families, 
if
> 
>> 
we 
don't 
let's 
just 
put 
up 
signs 
on 
the 
website 
that 
say 
12+ 
years 
old 
only
> 
>> 
so 
we 
can 
eliminate 
any 
family 
groups 
with 
younger 
kids.  
 
If 
you 
can 
explain
> 
>> 
why 
lounge 
is 
better 
than 
Zone 
for 
teens, 
I'd 
love 
to 
hear 
it.  
You 
seem
> 
>> 
pretty 
jaded 
for 
someone 
trying 
to 
get 
people 
to 
attend 
the 
con, 
maybe 
we
> 
>> 
should 
call 
it 
one 
of 
your 
names 
to 
really 
lower 
expectations.  
 
-Patrick
> 
>> 
----- 
Original 
Message 
-----  
F!
> 
>> 
rom: 
Robert 
Lionheart 
<mailto:spinachcat at yahoo.com>  
  
To:
> 
>> 
deptheads at strategicon.net 
<mailto:deptheads at strategicon.net>  
  
Sent:
> 
>> 
Thursday, 
February 
07, 
2008 
5:14 
PM  
Subject: 
Re: 
[Deptheads] 
Re: 
Computer
> 
>> 
Room 
Tourneys 
> 
>> 
Oh 
gods 
Patrick, 
are 
we 
doing 
it 
"for 
the 
children"?  
  
 
That's 
it!  
We're
> 
>> 
going 
with 
Video 
Game 
Bordello!  
Halo 
Orgy 
starts 
at 
noon!  
 
I 
like 
the
> 
>> 
non-family 
connotation 
of 
Lounge 
because 
we 
do 
not 
want 
the 
Video 
Game 
Space
> 
>> 
become 
the 
Babysitter 
Zone.  
 
We 
do 
not 
want 
parents 
using 
the 
con 
as 
a 
dump
> 
>> 
zone 
for 
their 
rugrats.  
 
I 
am 
quite 
sure 
Janice 
isn't 
signing 
up 
for
> 
>> 
Strategicon 
Day 
Care, 
aka 
Dungeons 
& 
Diapers.  
  
We 
want 
teens, 
not 
kids, 
as
> 
>> 
attendees.  
Kids 
are 
walking 
liabilities.  
Teens 
are 
walking 
wallets 
and
> 
>> 
awesome 
impule 
buyers 
for 
the 
dealer's 
room.  
Kids 
are 
a 
resource 
drain 
while
> 
>> 
Teens 
are 
networking 
gold.  
 
The 
12+ 
crowd 
is 
far 
far 
far 
more 
desirable 
than
> 
>> 
the 
6-11 
range.  
 
- 
Robert
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
Patrick 
Havert 
<patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net
> 
>> 
<mailto:patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net> 
> 
wrote: 
I 
agree 
with 
Janice 
in 
that
> 
>> 
Lounge 
has 
a 
kind 
of 
non-family 
connotation 
associated 
with 
it, 
that 
we 
do
> 
>> 
not 
want 
to 
foster.  
 
How 
about 
Video 
Game 
Zone, 
Video 
Games 
Live, 
or
> 
>> 
Interactive 
Gaming?  
_______________________________________________Deptheads
> 
>> 
mailing 
list 
Deptheads at strategicon.net 
<mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
<http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads>  
  
----------------
> 
>> 
Looking 
for 
last 
minute 
shopping 
deals? 
Find 
them 
fast 
with 
Yahoo! 
Search.
> 
>> 
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/ca
> 
>> 
tegory.php?category=shopping>  
----------------
> 
>> 
_______________________________________________Deptheads 
mailing
> 
>> 
listDeptheads at strategicon.net 
<mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
<http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads>  
______________!
> 
>> 
_________________________________Deptheads 
mailing
> 
>> 
listDeptheads at strategicon.net 
<mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
<http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads>
> 
>> 
----------------
> 
>> 
Never 
miss 
a 
thing.  
Make 
Yahoo 
your 
homepage.
> 
>> 
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
> 
>> 
_______________________________________________Deptheads 
mailing
> 
>> 
listDeptheads at strategicon.net 
<mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
<http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads>
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
-- 
Karl 
(zeotter at gmail.com 
<mailto:zeotter at gmail.com> 
)
> 
>> 
The 
wages 
of 
sin 
are 
death, 
but 
by 
the 
time 
taxes 
are 
taken 
out, 
it's 
just
> 
>> 
sort 
of 
a 
tired 
feeling.  
- 
Paula 
Poundstone
> 
>> 
_______________________________________________
> 
>> 
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
> 
>> 
Deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
_______________________________________________
> 
>> 
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
> 
>> 
Deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
> 
>>  
> 
>> 
> 
>> 
_______________________________________________
> 
>> 
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
> 
>> 
Deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
>> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
> 
> 
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
> 
> 
Deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> 
> 

> 
_______________________________________________
> 
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
> 
Deptheads at strategicon.net
> 
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads

_______________________________________________
Deptheads 
mailing 
list
Deptheads at strategicon.net
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20080211/e98fa9e3/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Deptheads mailing list