[Deptheads] More parking info

PJSZeta5 at aol.com PJSZeta5 at aol.com
Thu May 1 02:55:38 PDT 2008


I concur that hotel is giving us more problems than expected I wish we was  
still in the Westin LoL
 
 
In a message dated 4/30/2008 11:23:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
josemendiola at earthlink.net writes:

My 2  cents!!

After reading what each person has said and after what broken  promises that
the Raddison has done.  I believe to be a better idea to  move the con. 
After experiencing the way we were treated back in February  and up to this
last weekend.  The hotel was probably very aware of the  parking lot to be
torn down but has clearly failed to let us know well in  advance.  No one
plans to just suddenly rebuild a parking structure  without setting a date
well in advance.

Back in February.  I  got an earful of complaints from our partrons.  Our
reputation as an  organization is under the microsope.  We stand to lose a
great number  of patronage if we stay there.

> [Original Message]
> From:  Eric M. Aldrich I <ealdrich at penguinlust.org>
> To:  <deptheads at strategicon.net>
> Date: 4/30/2008 6:53:45 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Deptheads] More parking info
>
> Tim pretty much  spelled out the strategy exactly. We are trying to talk
to the Westin, as  we only left since we had no choice. If I could get the
Hilton, I'd take  it, but the only thing we have for certain is the Sheraton.
>
>  Again, with this in mind, department heads should seriously look  at:
>
>  http://www.sheratonlosangeles.com/meetings/index.html
>
> I mean  it. This might be our only choice if we want to move NOW, and it
needs to  be studied as objectively as possible.
>
> Eric
>
> On  Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:33:15PM -0700, Tim wrote:
> > Gamex '08 is  kind of a done deal.  I suggest we look at the bright side 
> >  of this.  If this had to happen, Gamex is the con to have it happen  to.

> > As Eric pointed out, this puts the Radisson in breach of  contract.  
> > Frankly I think we should be thankful.  I  don't think the Raddison is 
> > viable simply from the standpoint of  the rooms.  I heard more
complaints 
> > about the rooms than  anything else.  Forget the parking, forget the 
> > layout...if  the con attendees won't stay in the hotel, the rest doesn't 
> >  matter.  We were also screwed by the change of ownership, but the  
> > current situation is our "Get out of Jail Free Card" with the  Radisson.

> > My opinion is we should make the best deal we can  for Gamex and plan on 
> > moving Gateway '08.
> > 
>  > Lets investigate the other hotels...stay in the rooms, check the dates  
> > and layouts and decide which hotel works.  Eric can pick  people to 
> > review them.  We just need to be systematic and  and get it done then we 
> > can decide. 
> > 
> >  If you want my two sesterces, I say we should look very seriously at
the  
> > Sheraton and the Hilton.  I would recommend we don't  approach the
Westin 
> > again any time soon.  We will  look  like beggars with our "hats in our 
> > hands".  So  for now that leaves the Sheraton and the Hilton.  The 
> >  Sheraton has the dates free, the rooms are ok and I believe the 
> >  "frequent flyer miles" from the Westin work there.  Those are two big  
> > points in its favor.
> > 
> > Anyway, like I  said...those are my two sesterces.
> > 
> > Tim
> >  
> > t.aldrich at comcast.net wrote:
> > >The Marriott is  not an option. We have confirmation that all 3
weekends 
> >  >are booked by long standing re-occuring events.
> > >
>  > >Gateway 2007 is being considered in the move.
> >  >
> > >Gamex 2007 is unrealistic to move in less than 4  weeks.
> > >
> > >Our options at this time are
>  > >Sheraton Gateway [Not the best layout, but they have all dates free,  
> > >including Gateway 2007.]
> > >Hilton [Pretty  good layout. Dates haven't been checked yet.]
> > >Westin  [Workable layout. Dates haven't been checked yet.]
> > >
>  > >We highly recommend as many people as possible visit both these above  
> > >locations asap and see the layout and potential difficulties  for 
> > >themselves. This goes double for department heads that  are actually in
the 
> > >area.
> > >
> >  >Radisson [Great layout, but you all know the problems by now.]
>  > >
> > >We're considering all suggestions. 
> >  >
> > >Tanya
> > >
> > > --------------  Original message ----------------------
> > >From: Mike Fryer  <Michael.Fryer at magtek.com>
> > >  
> >  >>Moving for Gateway is not a realistic goal, we could do it, but  Hotels
> > >>will have space booked already.  In the LAX  area there are really only
> > >>four hotels that we can go to;  Radisson, Westin, Hilton, and the
> > >>Marriott.   Radisson is out of course, the Westin would screw us again
> >  >>sooner or later, the Hilton was not very interested in having us,  that
> > >>leaves the Marriott as our next best hope. Outside  of LAX, the few
> > >>hotels that would work are in very  expensive areas. The Sheraton
Gateway
> > >>might also work,  but we would have to look at the rooms, I think there
> > >>are  errors in their charts, the main ballroom may be much smaller than
>  > >>they indicate. 
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >>Mike Fryer
> >  >>
> > >> 
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >> 
> > >>
>  > >>From: deptheads-bounces at strategicon.net
> >  >>[mailto:deptheads-bounces at strategicon.net] On Behalf Of Eric  Burgess
> > >>Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:08 PM
> >  >>To: deptheads at strategicon.net
> > >>Subject: Re:  [Deptheads] More parking info
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >>That was unreal. I can't believe  how shabbily they treat a regular
> > >>customer. I'd love to  move this con but at the very least, Gateway
> > >>shouldn't be  there.
> > >>
> > >>On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:40  PM, Robert Lionheart
<spinachcat at yahoo.com>
> >  >>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>     
> > >>>This is such ridiculous BS we should call the Westin  and Sheraton
> > >>>      
> >  >>today, and then change the con location tomorrow. 
> >  >>
> > >> 
> > >>
> >  >>Hell yeah!
> > >>
> > >> 
> >  >>
> > >>Yesterday's treatment should be a wake up call  for everyone.   All our
> > >>work goes to making the  hotel an extra $100,000 and more.  You would
> > >>think  that they could have a little respect for the people who make
this
>  > >>money for them. 
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >>Here's the conservative basic  math:
> > >>
> > >>300 rooms x $100 each x 3  cons = $90,000
> > >>
> > >>1000 attendees x $5  each for food x 3 cons = $15,000
> > >>
> > >>  
> > >>
> > >> 
> > >>
>  > >> 
> > >>
> > >>
> >  >>
> > >>patrickhavert  <patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > >>
> >  >>    I think this is the lot next to the Subway.
> >  >>
> > >>    
> > >>
>  > >>    No offense, but there is no way we're going to get  500
> > >>additional cars in that lot.  This woman seems  completely out of touch
> > >>with reality.  This is  besides the fact that it is $13 a day with no
> >  >>in/out.
> > >>
> > >>     
> > >>
> > >>    They need to  eliminate the Room minimum or else we should try
> > >>and move  for this con.  None of this crap was in the contract, and we
> >  >>were told that the renovations were COMPLETED.  This is  such
ridiculous
> > >>BS we should call the Westin and  Sheraton today, and then change the
con
> > >>location  tomorrow. 
> > >>
> > >>    
>  > >>
> > >>    -Patrick
> >  >>
> > >>        -----Original  Message-----
> > >>        From:  deptheads-bounces at strategicon.net
> >  >>[mailto:deptheads-bounces at strategicon.net]On Behalf Of DB
> >  >>        Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:45  PM
> > >>        To:  deptheads at strategicon.net
> > >>         Subject: Re: [Deptheads] More parking info
> > >>
> >  >>        It's not too far.  Here's a sat view  google maps of that
> > >>parking lot.
> >  >>        
> > >>       http://tinyurl.com/4usyhw
> > >>       
> > >>        On 4/28/08 3:20 PM,  "Eric Burgess" <erburgess at gmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
>  > >>
> > >>        Does that  $13.00 include in-and-out privileges? That
> > >>sounds farther  than the Marriott and might be farther than the
Sheraton.
> >  >>        
> > >>       I still think they need to nix the room requirement. The
> >  >>bad buzz based on this solution has already had an effect and that  is
> > >>their fault.
> > >>       
> > >>        On Mon, Apr 28, 2008  at 3:13 PM, Eric M. Aldrich I
> > >><ealdrich at apple.com>  wrote:
> > >>
> > >>         Parking at the hotel. Seems they'll have the lot on the
> >  >>corner of Century and Vicksburg:
> > >>     
> > >>        >From  Deborah Lusby:
> > >>        
> >  >>        "parking will take about 14-16 months and  our guest will
> > >>have
> > >>     parking available at 6151 Century blvd which is located
>  > >>750 foot east of
> > >>         the hotel on the corner of Century and Vicksburg, which
> >  >>is walking
> > >>        distance.  The self parking rate is at $13.00 or you may
> > >>select  valet on
> > >>        located at the hotel  for $20.00 per day, valet is
> > >>limited. Once we
>  > >>        actually begin the construction we  will send you a map
> > >>that shows the
> >  >>        location. As for the renovation of the  meeting space, we
> > >>do not have
> > >>   any dates set as yet, it going to happen just not  sure
> > >>when, I will keep
> > >>     you posted."
> > >>         
> > >>        Eric
> >  >>        
> > >>       ---
> > >>        Eric M. Aldrich  I
> > >>        Apple Core Audio  Engineering
> > >>        Audio  Codecs
> > >>        
> >  >>        
> > >>       
> > >>         _______________________________________________
> > >>   Deptheads mailing list
> > >>     Deptheads at strategicon.net
> > >>     http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> >  >>
> > >>        
> >  >>
> > >>        
> >  >>________________________________
> > >>
> >  >>
> > >>         _______________________________________________
> > >>   Deptheads mailing list
> > >>     Deptheads at strategicon.net
> > >>     http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> >  >>
> > >>        
> >  >>
> > >>     _______________________________________________
> > >>   Deptheads mailing list
> > >>     Deptheads at strategicon.net
> > >>     http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> >  >>
> > >> 
> > >>
> >  >>________________________________
> > >>
> >  >>Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try
> > >>it now.
>  >
>><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http:/mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62
>  > >>sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ>  
> > >>
>  > >>
> >  >>_______________________________________________
> >  >>Deptheads mailing list
> >  >>Deptheads at strategicon.net
> >  >>http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> >  >>
> > >> 
> > >>
> >  >>
> > >>    
> > >
> >  >_______________________________________________
> > >Deptheads  mailing list
> > >Deptheads at strategicon.net
> >  >http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
> >  >
> > >
> > >__________ NOD32 3061 (20080428)  Information __________
> > >
> > >This message was  checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >  >http://www.eset.com
> > >
> > >
> >  >
> > >  
>
> >  _______________________________________________
> > Deptheads mailing  list
> > Deptheads at strategicon.net
> >  http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing  list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
>  http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads


_______________________________________________
Deptheads  mailing  list
Deptheads at strategicon.net
http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads





**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car 
listings at AOL Autos.      
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20080501/4115473f/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Deptheads mailing list