[Deptheads] Conbook proof 1

[twinkles girl]

I also vote for departmental as well. It is a much more organized, sleek look. If it can only be one way, I believe that is the better choice.
 
Lori
> From: ealdrich at penguinlust.org> To: deptheads at strategicon.net> Subject: Re: [Deptheads] Conbook proof 1> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 21:01:42 -0800> > Yes, this is a can of worms :-)> > We did it that way for the first year and got a lot of complaints from > gamers that wanted to see all the events going on at once.> > Eric> > On 08 Feb, 2009, at 19:25, Robyn Nixon wrote:> > > Departmental schedules are much prefered to that combined mishmash > > dump it> > all into the trunk schedule.> >> > Do we have a choice of one or the other??> >> > If so, I vote for departmental!> >> > Robyn> >> >> > On 2/8/09 7:07 PM, "Eric M. Aldrich I" <ealdrich at penguinlust.org> > > wrote:> >> >> Yes, it needs work and some art work.> >>> >> http://www.strategicon.net/forms/Orccon09Conbook-proof01.pdf> >>> >> The by department schedules had to go -- they ate up too much space.> >>> >> Eric> >>> >> _______________________________________________> >> Deptheads mailing list> >> Deptheads at strategicon.net> >> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads> >> >> > _______________________________________________> > Deptheads mailing list> > Deptheads at strategicon.net> > http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads> > _______________________________________________> Deptheads mailing list> Deptheads at strategicon.net> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20090208/d9648f28/attachment.htm