[Deptheads] Convention Booklet

DB noldor at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 14:39:38 PST 2008


I agree with this.

The website is the ³face² of the con and people often determine if it¹s
worth going to the con based on it.  The con book could be better...but it¹s
not going to decided whether or not people show up for our next con.

It¹s why I¹ve asked several times that event listings for previous cons be
retained simply so people can see what¹s come before and what they might
expect for future cons.  Still, nothing has been posted.  That¹s what I
really like about PolyCon in that you can see prior year¹s events.

 - Den


On 2/25/08 2:30 PM, "Eric Burgess" <erburgess at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd hold off on spending any cash for a professional designer on the conbook.
> I mean, we all want changes but this isn't a serious issue worth throwing cash
> at, methinks. Let us give it a stab first. I'll put some time aside next month
> to try and reorganize it and send it out for comments.
> Web sites: Kublcon's site is the best I've seen. I think spending some on that
> would be more worthwhile than spending anything on the conbook.
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20080225/4ebb6574/attachment.htm


More information about the Deptheads mailing list