[Deptheads] Convention Booklet

[DB]

This is the feedback seminar with four people attending, right?

I wouldn¹t base too much future action on this feedback.  Maybe those four
people only looked at the con book for a schedule...


On 2/25/08 2:50 PM, "Patrick Havert" <patrickhavert at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> Folks,
>  
> The only problem is that people don't read the conbook.  At the Feedback
> seminar all the people there said they just look at the schedules, and when I
> asked in the ballroom if people had looked at stuff other than the schedules
> everyone said no.  We are in a limited time frame for people at the cons, so
> they want to maximize their fun.  Posting schedules/special events will be one
> of the more effective ways to help people find things.
>  
> -Patrick
>>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>  
>> From:  Eric  Burgess <mailto:erburgess at gmail.com>
>>  
>> To: deptheads at strategicon.net
>>  
>> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 2:30  PM
>>  
>> Subject: Re: [Deptheads] Convention  Booklet
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> I'd hold off on spending any cash for a professional designer on the
>> conbook.  I mean, we all want changes but this isn't a serious issue  worth
>> throwing cash at, methinks. Let us give it a stab first. I'll put some  time
>> aside next month to try and reorganize it and send it out for  comments.
>>  
>> Web sites: Kublcon's site is the best I've seen. I think spending some on
>> that would be more worthwhile than spending anything on the conbook.
>>  
>>  
>>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20080225/7385e86b/attachment-0001.htm