[Deptheads] Orccon Space Layout

[Karl Kreder]

I realize I don't draw a huge crowd but I do have some suggestions for this
discussion.

There are board gamers who behind the scenes with Patrick fought to get open
gaming in the first place. They are the ones who feel like door mats at the
con and are going to be very upset, granted they are not a very big group
but I thought I would speak for them, being the other not big group.

I have to be honest, this of course is coming from an outsiders perspective,
but mini's don't fill up.  Every time I have heard that people say there are
going to be a lot of mini's players there are not.  I know the broadside
bash fills, but it has it's own room right?  It seems to me that expanded
mini's is important but I don't think you have to steam roll every thing to
do it.

You want to get mini's in to open gaming, I think that is a good idea but
put two or three risers in the open gaming area and see what you get.

I believe John P pointed out that growing open gaming is going to take time,
and it has don't take it away now that it is starting to grow.  Last con we
had quite a few people use open gaming, I set up the War Game Boot Camp
right in front of it and watched it all con.

I think what is happening is everyone has a perspective they think is right
(including me).  I think it would be better to discuss with individual
departments what your ideas are before just announcing to the entire group
sweeping changes you want to do.  Everyone is on edge and get's territorial
when you do things like that.

I can only speak for board games since that is where my experience lies but
I know it is hard enough trying to coordinate the amount and quality of the
games they schedule.  I think that also asking them to schedule down exactly
how many tables and when is asking too much.

Just my opinion...


On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Tim <Tim at stugiii.com> wrote:

>  There is no other place to put miniatures.
>
> mike fryer wrote:
>
> >It also makes sense to use open gaming as an overflow and to give all our
> attendees access to it.
>
> I don't agree with this premise. OG should have a defined area to keep open
> gaming from setting up in other areas. You can't say setup your game in this
> area, unless we need it for something else. I think reducing OG and making
> more room for Minis is fine. Minis gets some open mini gaming as is.
>
> Are we certain that the foyer is a good location for minis?
> What do Robyn and Jose think they will need and where do they want to be?
> What about John's events that take up large amounts of space?
>
> OG can be adjusted very easily, lets figure out Minis needs before find a
> solution for it. I am not arguing against getting Minis more room, I just
> don't think this is a good way to do it.
>
>
> Mike Fryer
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing listDeptheads at strategicon.nethttp://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>
> --
>
> *“What manner of man are you that can summon up fire without flint or
> tinder?”*
>
> *“I... am an enchanter.”*
>
> *“By what name are you known?”*
>
> *“There are some who call me... 'Tim'...”*
>
> * *
>
> *My Sturmgeschütz Site <http://www.stugiii.com/> *
>
> *My Painting Blog <http://theenchanterscave.blogspot.com/>*
>
> *Strategicon Game Conventions <http://www.strategicon.net/> *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>


-- 
Karl (zeotter at gmail.com)

"When I was born I was so surprised I didn't talk for a year and a half."
 - Gracie Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20091117/539cd004/attachment.htm