[Deptheads] Miniature Bootcamp

[Tim Keennon]

I think it is a bad idea to play people to play demo games.   If we do 
the bootcamp correctly, they should be games people want to learn.  We 
can track that with the numbers.  If you offer "pay for play" the 
numbers are of less value. 

Tim

Janice Sellers wrote:
> I don't think we should be handing out dealer dollars for demos.  That
> said, my opinion is that if we have dealer dollars for some demos, we
> should have DD for all of them, in all departments, for exactly the
> reason Robyn says -- it looks like favoritism if only some demos have
> payments.
>
> Janice
>
> On 10/19/09, Robyn Nixon <robynln at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>>  Paying of dealer dollars to event participants:  This was not done for all
>> demos, creating an inequity situation.  This also was recognized by
>> participants as well as GMs who did not get the dealer dollars to distribute
>> to their demoees.  I have since received several inquiries of whether their
>> demos will also receive this support.  My question to department heads is
>> whether the distribution of dealer dollars to demo participants is the
>> correct action for our convention, and if it is, what is the appropriate
>> amount that we should be distributing to people who participate in demos,
>> and whether we should be doing this for all demos, or only ones demonstrates
>> as our favorites (favoritism?).
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20091020/29810eef/attachment.htm