Feedback Seminar [Was Re: [Deptheads] Boilerplate proof]
Eric M. Aldrich I
ealdrich at apple.com
Sun May 23 20:52:16 PDT 2010
We will keep it for this show and the next. After that, we may want to
scrap it, but we'll decide in the "Off season" :-)
Eric
On 23 May, 2010, at 18:39, Tim wrote:
> Burgess asks a good question. I think it is worthwhile, if I recall
> correctly we always get two or three things we need to focus on for
> next time. I also think it is better PR to have it than not to. It
> says we are accessible for complaints and comments.
>
> At least that is my opinion. Does anyone else have comments pro or
> con?
>
> Tim
>
> Eric Burgess wrote:
>>
>> Is there general agreement that the feedback seminar is useful as
>> opposed to asking people to post comments on the forum and
>> answering them there? I found that last one to be a pretty poor use
>> of time. If you pushed people to comment on the forum, it might
>> drive more traffic there and other than three or four gadflies, I
>> don't think the convention management is buying much in the way of
>> good will any longer.
>>
>> It may be that it just needs more discipline - take down the issue,
>> comment if there is an immediate response and then move on to the
>> next one. At the last session, there was a fifteen minute
>> discussion about who among the staff could get the best rate on
>> phone lines.
>>
>> Just my two cents. If everything thinks it is worthwhile, order up
>> the pizza.
>>
>> ...ERB
>> www.boardgamebabylon.com
>> www.strategicon.net
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tim <tim at stugiii.com> wrote:
>> One thing we should include, the feedback seminar pizza needs to be
>> mentioned...
>>
>>
>> Eric M. Aldrich I wrote:
>>> http://www.strategicon.net/forms/ConbookGamex2010_01.pdf
>>>
>>> This is no where near done, but it has the boilerplate for the
>>> show. The main thing to check is for the sponsors and the info on
>>> the exhibitors.
>>>
>>> I also need a blurb for our special guests and some photos -- if
>>> these already got sent to me remind me :-)
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Deptheads mailing list
>>> Deptheads at strategicon.net
>>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>
>>>
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>> signature database 5139 (20100523) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> "Among our chief weapons are fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency
>> and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…” - Cardinal Ximinez
>>
>> www.strategicon.net www.StuGIII.com
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature database 5139 (20100523) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Deptheads mailing list
>> Deptheads at strategicon.net
>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Deptheads mailing list
>> Deptheads at strategicon.net
>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>> signature database 5139 (20100523) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>
> --
> "Among our chief weapons are fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency and
> an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope…” - Cardinal Ximinez
>
> www.strategicon.net www.StuGIII.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 5139 (20100523) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
More information about the Deptheads
mailing list