[Deptheads] The Saga Of The Three Con Names

evil5757 at aol.com evil5757 at aol.com
Tue Apr 30 18:38:47 PDT 2013


Yep, I remember that event. It was exactly 30 years before Burgess became relavant, right?


Connected by Motorola

Tim <tim at stugiii.com> wrote:

>Actually Orccon was founded by HMGS.  I believe it was "Orccon", then 
>"Son of Orccon".  It reverted back to "Orccon" after that. Orccon = 
>Orange County Convention which is where it was originally held.
>
>Someone besides John has to give history lessons on occasion...
>
>Tim
>
>
>On 4/30/2013 4:18 PM, Victor B wrote:
>> Thanks for all the input everyone.
>> Orccon was first and was established in 1977. The other 2 followed. 
>> The original founder from 77 plus some of the other previous owners 
>> are vendors at our con, and/or support our con. I even met 2 previous 
>> owners at GAMA--one from the 80s and one from the 90s. They both 
>> talked fondly of the con and started sentences off with "back in 1995 
>> when I ran the con....". Neither has lived in cali for many years. We 
>> have a rich 36 year history. There are less than a handful of people, 
>> like Ryan, that have been with this con over 25 years and been a part 
>> of 70+ of it's conventions. This con will still be going when most all 
>> of us have moved on.
>> I mentioned Orccon, Gamex and Gateway versus strategicon 3X a year 
>> (feb, may, sept) because I wanted everyone here to put in their 
>> 2-cents before we made a decision.
>> I wanted everyone to hear what Ryan, Norm, Mike Russell, Mike Fryer, 
>> Eric N., Eric B., and Kryssie had to say as well as supervisors and 
>> others on this list. Your input is valuable.
>> Thanks
>> V
>>
>> *From:* Michael Russell <mikeinva8 at mac.com>
>> *To:* deptheads at strategicon.net
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 30, 2013 1:52 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Deptheads] The Saga Of The Three Con Names
>>
>> Ok just wanted to get my two cents in on this before the final word 
>> comes down.  I think that we need to have either Strategicon or the 
>> name of the conventions on the banners for few reason.  One, not only 
>> are people at the hotel for the convention, but a lot of guest of the 
>> hotel walk through wondering what is going on.  With out Strategicon 
>> or the con names  on the banners there is NOTHING advertising who we 
>> are. When working the reg desk many many times people have noted the 
>> name Strategicon or the con name when asking what was going on. 
>>  Second if someone is new to the cons, this reaffirms they are in the 
>> right place, and with a move coming soon, I think we need this more 
>> than ever.
>>
>> As for the names of the Cons (Orccon, Gamex, Gateway) they have been 
>> those name for over 25-30 years(Yes me and Eric A. have been going to 
>> these con for that long), and have worked well (by the way for those 
>> of you that don't know this, Orccon stood for Orange county 
>> Convention) not the ugly beast :)   When ever I think of changing the 
>> names I think of companies that did that and it was a disaster - Think 
>> Radio Shack trying to change to "The Shack" how well did that work for 
>> them?   And all three names are something easy to remember, so when 
>> they get home and google it, right of the bat, strategicon come up, 
>> and that is what we want.
>>
>> As for each Convention having a "Theme" not bad but like someone else 
>> said have it very low key, like the program cover art of one con be 
>> board games, another war games and another RPG.  We do not want people 
>> saying "Oh I don't go to Gamex because that is there RPG con", we 
>> might loose people to something like that.
>>
>> So that is my two cents worth.
>> Mike Russell
>>
>>
>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Tim <tim at stugiii.com 
>> <mailto:tim at stugiii.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike will get the decision by tomorrow morning...
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/30/2013 10:34 AM, Ryan McMullan wrote:
>>>> In the interim before a bold leadership decision is made, I second 
>>>> just listing department name so the posters aren't in limbo.
>>>> Ryan
>>>> On Apr 30, 2013 9:32 AM, "evil5757 at aol.com 
>>>> <mailto:evil5757 at aol.com>" <evil5757 at aol.com 
>>>> <mailto:evil5757 at aol.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Everyone, the purpose of the banners is to let people know where
>>>>     they are. Drop everything but the department. They know we're
>>>>     strategicon and they know what convention it is! They're there!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     /Connected by Motorola/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     mike fryer <darkbeerdrinker at gmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:darkbeerdrinker at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Why is that a problem and why should there be a difference? All
>>>>     three are game cons run by the same people at the same location,
>>>>     how different can they be? When have they ever been different
>>>>     and all own by the same person(s)?
>>>>
>>>>     Mike Fryer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Tim Keennon <tim at stugiii.com
>>>>     <mailto:tim at stugiii.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         That is the problem we have. There should be something
>>>>         different and there isn't at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>         Not making the cons distinct entities is one of our issues.
>>>>
>>>>         Tim
>>>>
>>>>         Sent from my mobile device.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Apr 30, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Neil Figuracion
>>>>         <fadtwentythree at gmail.com <mailto:fadtwentythree at gmail.com>>
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>         I'll throw this question out:
>>>>>
>>>>>         Other than time of year, what's different about each
>>>>>         convention?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Eric Nyquist
>>>>>         <thatericn at aol.com <mailto:thatericn at aol.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>             Hi -
>>>>>
>>>>>             Since we've been the convention ownership, there definitely has been a moderately strong shift towards using Strategicon as a blanket term, versus the individual names. Back in "ye olde days" the phrase "Strategicon presents" was more boilerplate than identification; more of the background ownership than the out-front name and face for the conventions.
>>>>>
>>>>>             My suggestion to harmonize the naming issue would be to do something like this on the flyers, con books, web, social media, etc.:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             *ORCCON*
>>>>>
>>>>>             /Strategicon's Winter Convention/
>>>>>
>>>>>             *GAMEX*
>>>>>
>>>>>             /Strategicon's Spring Convention/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             *GATEWAY*
>>>>>
>>>>>             /Strategicon's Summer Convention/
>>>>>
>>>>>             /
>>>>>
>>>>>             /
>>>>>
>>>>>             /
>>>>>
>>>>>             /
>>>>>
>>>>>             ... or we might consider/"Strategicon's Winter Gaming Convention"/  or even/"Strategicon's Winter Event"/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             Recognized names are kept, no babies are thrown out with bathwater, while each con's identity is better defined and clarified.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             Eric N.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>>             Deptheads mailing list
>>>>>             Deptheads at strategicon.net
>>>>>             <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>>>>             http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>>         Deptheads mailing list
>>>>>         Deptheads at strategicon.net <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>>>>         http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Deptheads mailing list
>>>>         Deptheads at strategicon.net <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>>>         http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     Deptheads mailing list
>>>>     Deptheads at strategicon.net <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>>>     http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Deptheads mailing list
>>>> Deptheads at strategicon.net  <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> */Hadrian decided to build his wall so the Scots would be left 
>>> undisturbed in their never-ending war against their mortal enemies... 
>>> the Scots/*
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Deptheads mailing list
>>> Deptheads at strategicon.net <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Deptheads mailing list
>> Deptheads at strategicon.net <mailto:Deptheads at strategicon.net>
>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Deptheads mailing list
>> Deptheads at strategicon.net
>> http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>-- 
>*/Hadrian decided to build his wall so the Scots would be left 
>undisturbed in their never-ending war against their mortal enemies... 
>the Scots/*
>
>_______________________________________________
>Deptheads mailing list
>Deptheads at strategicon.net
>http://mordred.punk.net/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mordred.punk.net/pipermail/deptheads/attachments/20130430/48bcbd21/attachment-0001.htm


More information about the Deptheads mailing list