[Deptheads] Deptheads Digest, Vol 82, Issue 12

[Tim]

Shane was asking for opinions...

-----Original Message-----
From: Deptheads [mailto:deptheads-bounces at strategicon.net] On Behalf Of Eric Aldrich
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 3:12 PM
To: deptheads at strategicon.net
Subject: Re: [Deptheads] Deptheads Digest, Vol 82, Issue 12

This is correct.

Eric

On 8 Sep 2014, at 14:51 , Chris Carlson <ccarlson101 at hotmail.com> wrote:

> I thought we moved away from blanket/fixed rates of perk earnership? That it would be determined by the Department Head?
> 
> Chris
>  
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:09:36 -0700
> > From: "evil5757 at aol.com" <evil5757 at aol.com>
> > To: deptheads at strategicon.net
> > Subject: Re: [Deptheads] GM Badge Requirements
> > Message-ID: <abx75jpcbpcopc9mgxvw3fiw.1410210576333 at email.android.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > 
> > We can't make a con wide rule on this. Not only are the work requirements different between departments, there are GMs who care and really put effort into their events.
> > 
> > We need to let the Department Heads determine who gets what based on ALL the factors, not just hard numbers. A "loose base" is fine, but give the DH latitude to make final determination.
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > Connected by Motorola
> > 
> > Tanya Aldrich <taldrich at punk.net> wrote:
> > 
> > >If we make a con-wide ruling, it needs to make sense for all departments. 12 hrs may not work for some (LARPs), which is why I think 48 player hours allows for more flexibility (LARPs from my understanding would have a lot less trouble with that). How many games across the con have less than 4 players normally?
> > >
> > >Tanya
> > >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads

_______________________________________________
Deptheads mailing list
Deptheads at strategicon.net
https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads