[Deptheads] Website, Part II
Strategicon Department Heads
deptheads at strategicon.net
Mon May 2 13:48:03 PDT 2016
Shane,
My system is more of what the payouts will be, although I do have criteria
as to what constitutes and actual tournament and I define the payouts.
Luckily, that is a pretty easy distinction to make in minis games. The fact
that it is an option doesn't bother me, especially now that the size isn't
user definable, but if it was gone it wouldn't break my heart either. Last
con I had 91 events, 14 of which were payouts, so we operate on a different
scale. I would be interested to see what your system entails so I could
loot anything useful from it.
Mike
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Strategicon Department Heads <
deptheads at strategicon.net> wrote:
> Message From: Tanya Aldrich taldrich at strategicon.net
>
> I’m not a department head, but for some clarification I have added another
> sentence to the tournaments info in the tooltips. Has anyone noticed the
> tooltips? :)
>
> Also, I will be putting Small, Big, and Mega settings and Special under
> admin/dept head control only.
>
> I can add “(Approval Required)" to the tournament option. It’s not like
> all events don’t require some approval, so the added notice will be a heads
> up that it might not stay.
>
> Tanya
>
> On May 2, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Strategicon Department Heads <
> deptheads at strategicon.net> wrote:
>
> Message From: Shane Sauby ssshanucon at yahoo.com
> Okay, so I just tried submitting an event and it was fine. Computers are
> why people become crazy =)
>
> Another minor issue, that I would like input from other department heads,
> involves tournaments. I have a system for determining which events should
> be tournaments and which shouldn't. The decision of whether a game is a
> tournament is usually mine alone, except if a game is sponsored (which is
> now a tournament sub-type) Does anyone else have a similar system?
>
> I ask because I would like to suggest that all tournament types, except
> sponsored, be removed from the event submission page. I often have to
> explain that just because a GM wants a game to have a payout, it doesn't
> get one. Because GMs see the list on the event submission page, they get
> the impression they can decide whether there is a payout or not.
>
> Anyway, I was curious what others thought about this suggestion.
>
> Shane Sauby
> Boardgames Supervisor
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Deptheads mailing list
> Deptheads at strategicon.net
> https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://strategicon.net/archives/deptheads/attachments/20160502/56a115fe/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Deptheads
mailing list