[Deptheads] Deptheads Digest, Vol 82, Issue 12

[Victor B]

We stated that rooms and parking were no longer going to be awarded based on hours---supervisors would based on the room slots and parking they had available. 

We left the 8 hours "minimum" for a GM badge on the website as a guideline with the final decision on a badge given by a dept. up to that supervisor who approves all the events, time slots, and hours run. A volunteer badge was up to the supervisor to award but someone wanting to GM games would have an idea of how much they would need to do in order to earn a badge. In the end it is up to the supervisor. The website could simply state "if you want to earn a badge by gming or volunteering contact that supervisor for details". But it is easier if people see bare minimum requirements and can submit events and then be contacted by the supervisor during the approval process if the supervisor  feels this person needs to do more to earn their badge. Otherwise you would have to contact every single person after they listed events.



V 


On Monday, September 8, 2014 4:01 PM, mike fryer <darkbeerdrinker at gmail.com> wrote:
  


I have never heard that.  Maybe for more than a badge, but 8 hours for a badge has always been the golden rule as far as I know. 
On Sep 8, 2014 2:51 PM, "Chris Carlson" <ccarlson101 at hotmail.com> wrote:

I thought we moved away from blanket/fixed rates of perk earnership? That it would be determined by the Department Head?
>
>Chris
>
> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:09:36 -0700
>> From: "evil5757 at aol.com" <evil5757 at aol.com>
>> To: deptheads at strategicon.net
>> Subject: Re: [Deptheads] GM Badge Requirements
>> Message-ID: <abx75jpcbpcopc9mgxvw3fiw.1410210576333 at email.android.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>> 
>> We can't make a con wide rule on this. Not only are the work requirements different between departments,  there are GMs who care and really put effort into their events.
>> 
>> We need to let the Department Heads determine who gets what based on ALL the factors, not just hard numbers. A "loose base" is fine, but give the DH latitude to make final determination.
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> Connected by Motorola
>> 
>> Tanya Aldrich <taldrich at punk.net> wrote:
>> 
>> >If we make a con-wide ruling, it needs to make sense for all departments. 12 hrs may not work for some (LARPs), which is why I think 48 player hours allows for more flexibility (LARPs from my understanding would have a lot less trouble with that). How many games across the con have less than 4 players normally?
>> >
>> >Tanya
>> >
>
>  
>_______________________________________________
>Deptheads mailing list
>Deptheads at strategicon.net
>https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
>
>

_______________________________________________
Deptheads mailing list
Deptheads at strategicon.net
https://strategicon.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deptheads
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://strategicon.net/archives/deptheads/attachments/20140908/5d886844/attachment-0001.html>